Skip to content
Policies for this siteCreate an account
OmphalisDocumentation

How this content is licensed

Reviewed 2026-08-05 (revised).

Two kinds of material sit on this site and they are governed differently. Knowing which you are reading tells you what you may do with it.

Documentation, written by Omphalis

Everything outside the Learn section is written by Omphalis about Omphalis. You may quote it, link to it, and reproduce it for the purpose of explaining or evaluating the product, including in a review that is unfavourable.

You may not present it as your own work, and you may not modify it and continue to attribute it to Omphalis — a modified statement about what the product does is a statement Omphalis did not make.

Republished courses, in the Learn section

Learn pages carry course text that Omphalis produced, alongside a citation for every source a course draws on. The citation names the source and links to it. The course text follows the same terms as the documentation above.

The cited sources do not. This site carries no source material itself — no article body, no excerpt, no transcript, no re-hosted audio or video, and no embedded player — and that holds for every course at every licence tier without exception. What you get is the citation and the link, and the source stays under whatever terms its own publisher sets.

That constraint is the reason these pages can be public at all, and it is enforced rather than intended: a course whose material would breach it is not published, and the checks that decide run again on every republication rather than once at the start.

If a course cites your work

Two things are already true: the citation names you and links to you, and none of your material is reproduced here.

If you want the citation changed or removed anyway, the contact route is on the main Omphalis site. A removal is applied to the published site directly and does not wait for the next content build, and it applies to every page citing the work rather than only the one you name.

Reporting something wrong

A citation pointing at the wrong source, or attributing something to the wrong author, is a defect rather than a licensing question — but it is worth telling us about through the same route, because a wrong attribution is worse than a missing one.

What is not covered here

The Omphalis application's terms are separate and govern your own saved material, which never appears on this site. Nothing you save in Omphalis is published here, and no page on this site is derived from any individual account.